Intelligence

What I'm watching in AI×GTM

I review 50+ articles a day through the STEEPWORKS intelligence pipeline. The ones worth your time end up here — with my notes on why they matter and what patterns I'm seeing.

Daily GTM Feed

Latest curated picks

AI DevelopmentSaaStr — Jason LemkinVictor's pick

Amjad Masad and Me at SaaStr AI 2026: The Agents We Actually Built, and What Replit’s Founder Thinks Comes Next

Especially the overall idea of reporting to agents

  • Context windows expanding from 16K to 1M+ tokens enables perpetually-running agents that never need rebooting, fundamentally changing agent architecture from ephemeral to persistent
  • Mono repo architecture (10 apps in one codebase) beats separate apps for AI agents because global context compounds - agent remembers how it built previous apps when building new ones
  • Self-improving agents are production-ready: Replit's internal agent autonomously reads traces nightly, generates PRs with prompt improvements, ships A/B tests, and loops back without human intervention
ai-coding-toolsautomation-stacksai-sdr-adoption
Personal Productivity & AI-Augmented WorkLenny's Newsletter

GLM 5.2: why I’m replacing Opus in Claude Code with this new model

  • Open-weight models like GLM 5.2 can replace premium models (Claude Opus) at 1-2% of the cost ($3.36 for 6M tokens vs ~$300+ for Opus)
  • GLM 5.2 successfully handled production tasks: codebase architecture audit, UI redesign matching existing design system, and 45-minute autonomous bug hunting from real logs
  • Open-weight models provide vendor independence and cost predictability for AI coding workflows, challenging the assumption that frontier models are necessary for production coding tasks
ai-coding-toolscursor-vs-copilotautomation-stacks
Personal Productivity & AI-Augmented Workr/ClaudeAI

I added a clause to Andrej Karpathy's 4 CLAUDE.MD clauses for Claude Code. It has been a game changer for me.

  • Karpathy's original 4 Claude rules (ask don't assume, simplest solution first, don't touch unrelated code, flag uncertainty) were designed to prevent AI hallucination and over-engineering but had unintended consequence of silencing AI's reasoning capabilities
  • Adding a 5th clause explicitly inviting Claude to suggest better approaches transformed it from a 'code producer' back into a 'pair programmer' that contributes strategic thinking during code reviews
  • The evolution shows a maturation in AI coding workflows: early adopters started with strict constraints to prevent bad AI behavior, now refining to unlock collaborative reasoning while maintaining guardrails
ai-coding-toolscursor-vs-copilotai-writing-workflows
AI DevelopmentLenny's Newsletter

How Claude Mythos found a 15-year-old bug in Mozilla Firefox | Brian Grinstead

  • Agentic bug-finding requires sophisticated infrastructure—LLM judge for file ranking, verifier subagent to catch false positives, goal-loop pattern for retries—not just pointing AI at code
  • Teams with existing fuzzing, CI, and dev tooling infrastructure have massive advantage in AI adoption; the harness matters as much as the model
  • The 'score, verify, fix' loop pattern is generalizable beyond engineering to design quality, conversion optimization, and tech debt—non-engineers can reuse the framework
ai-coding-toolsautomation-stacksagentic-workflows
STEEPWORKS Weekly

Weekly intelligence, not weekly noise

Every Wednesday, the week's most important AI×GTM developments — distilled through 7 specialist agents, debated, and synthesized into what actually matters for operators.

Get this in your inbox

One email per week. The signal without the noise. Unsubscribe anytime.